the x factor of science

You may also be interested in

Science and its advances are more than ever at the center of today with all the disorders that the world is experiencing today. Can or should co-innovation participate? On what topics? In what terms? That’s the whole pointa survey carried out in collaboration between Futura and EDF Pulse i tu December 2021. The topic was fascinating given the enthusiasm for the answers and the first lessons, waiting to discover all the answers published in the First review of the role of Futura.

“All issues can be addressed, even the essence of innovation is to go beyond the perceptible limits”

According to the participants, a co-innovation project must have a multiple impact: 82% ecological (82%) but also science (73%) and society (64%). Only 39% are in favor of an economic impact, which seems secondary, no doubt because it is more a means than an end in itself. The most anticipated topics are related the environment (79%), technology (70%), energy (70%) o Science (63%). On the other hand, issues that are too divisive, too strategic or too expert, such as politics, seem less conducive to co-innovation. One of the participants also stressed the need to cross issues as well: “ Too often we take issues one after the other instead of thinking more globally. This is our challenge spices. “The most important thing for another is that” it does not serve one individual or a group of individuals for the benefit of another, everyone must be a winner “.

“Co-innovation can advance science by shaking up established ideas or concepts by providing absurd or original ideas.”

In the case of science in particular, co-innovation allows us to shake off certainties and encourages questioning, as long as it is truly multidisciplinary. ” Co-innovation allows you to dominate several people different skills and from various fields to discuss and try to concretize an idea or even several. These ideas would thus advance science “, Explains a participant in particular. Another virtue: it promotes the democratization of subjects and involves the citizen in scientific matters. Even most which are based on unfounded ideological bases are favorable to co-innovation because they put contradictory ideas on the table and feed the work of the co-innovator. “.

Co-innovation also refocuses on the actual use of innovations and promotes ownership by the general public as this will to ” create more bridges between science and the economic world / society: co-innovation can, in my view, better establish the link between scientific advances (in subject matter knowledge, technologies, etc.) and their specific implementation in everyday life, so that they can really affect society “.

“To know how to listen is to own, in addition to one’s own, the brains of others”

This quote from Leonardo De Vinci he was acclaimed for defining the virtues of co-innovation as well as Albert Einstein : ” Creativity is contagious, it is transmitted ! Therefore, the notions of listening, dialogue and creativity are valued rather to the detriment of the idea of ​​disruptive innovation embodied by the quote from Henry Ford, who received only 5% of the votes: ” If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses. The contribution is considered mainly in terms of ideas (81%) and testing of products or services (55%), rather than advice (22%) or organization (12%), highlighted by one participant: co – innovation, by involving people with needs – ideas, will force researchers to drive their thinking and translate their concepts into feasible products. Attract financiers and talent It should be noted that 49% of respondents agree to contribute “unconditionally” or simply “in recognition of their work.”

“It is through the prism of each that a global vision is made accessible”

How should co-innovation be done? Transparent, universal, applied to current issues …, the words that emerge most reflect a desire for openness on the part of the participants, as one of them says “. it is through the prism of each that a global vision becomes accessible The principle of co – innovation is to bring together a sufficient number of participants so that there are ideas and solutions emerging, with citizens (37%) and companies (30%) as a priority, who are expected to propose issues, while the public authorities, with only 8%, seem to have lost their legitimacy in this scope. In any case, participants are open to sharing their ideas. Only 11% of them believe that they are the owners, while 45% want to manage them as common property, therefore, by a community of users, and 42% opt for open source, therefore modified and released by any individual.

Check out the full results here!

Are you interested in what you just read?

Leave a Comment